Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 (Old Gen.) on Linux: a Honest Review

So, I have been using a Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 for quite some time. I have now changed to another cheaper interface, and I though it was a good occasion to draw my conclusions on what I think about the Scarlett.

Overall, my opinions are mixed. There are good pros about this device, but also few significant cons.

Although the product I am reviewing is not current anymore (there is a new generation out there now) I think it might still be useful to have a look into this, as it can give some insight about what kind of products and functionality we can expect from Focusrite.

My History with the Product

I got my first Scarlett on 17 June 2014 for 178 Euros. It lasted less than 10 minutes. the interface analog electronics stopped working as soon as I connected a condenser microphone and pressed the +48V button. I could see the interface registering under ALSA, and I could start JACK. However, no input, no output.

I concluded that some component was probably fried in some way by the +48V. I though I just got a bad unit. It was replaced with a new one for free, as it was under warranty, and I have been using that until last Christmas.

The Mechanical Aspects

The interface might look rugged at first sight, but that impression did not last long after I started using it. The switches are not really sturdy: it feels like a bad hit could break them easily. The potentiometers caps are easily removed, but they were not too loose, so I would be surprised if they could came off on their own. The pots themselves were well retained on the front panel by their mounting nuts. What I felt like it was the absolute worst were the audio connectors. The XLR/JACK connectors worn out very soon, by not even heavy usage (I used this interface very sporadically). During the last month of usage they would make awful clicking noises and often need some tinkering to ensure a reliable connection, like some gentle shake of the Jack plug of my guitar.

The Electronics

For my master dissertation (See here) I had a chance to measure this interface frequency response. More exactly, I used a technique, called swept sine technique, which allows to measure frequency responses of audio systems. To measure an interface we can loop its output back to its input, and stream a swept sine. The response of the output and input stage of the interface will distort the swept sine, and by comparing it with the pristine one we can find the interface response. The result is shown below.


Just focus on the orange curve (the blue just has a phase shift). We can see that, in the audible range, the interface response is -dead- flat. This is good, as we want neutrality of what we record. The drop at high frequency is actually were the bandwidth of my measuring swept sine ended. The phase doesn’t look bad either. Phase that rolls in that way, in fact, will introduce just an overall delay to the signal.

So, in this regards, the interface is very good.

However, there is a nitpicking: the potentiometer used to balance input and playback to the headphone would make some signal from playback leak into the headphone when it was set to completely to input.

I did not use the MIDI connectors a whole lot, but they worked just fine.


latency was acceptable. You can see many latency tests being reported in this thread on Linux Musicians.

The tests were performed with jack_iodelay (see this HOW-TO), which is a nice utility able to measure round trip latency. jack_iodelay outputs a multi-tone signal that can can be steamed to an output of the interface. This output of the interface can then be connected to one of its inputs through a cable. The signal at this input can then be patched into jack_iodelay input. By comparing the phase difference between its output and input, jack_iodelay can calculate the total loop-back latency. Hence, jack_iodelay  will report the sum of the latency from input electronics and analog to digital conversion (ADC), the latency from hardware controllers, the buffering latency from the operating system audio stack, the latency of output electronics and digital to analog conversion (DAC). Given that the buffering latency can be calculated a priori, we can subtract it to find the latency that is hardware related only. This is called the extra loop-back latency, which for the Scarlett was around 8 ms,  Given that the total loop-back latency, which includes all delays, was around 13 ms, we can see that the Scarlett was responsible for almost 62% of the total latency. Still, we can expect ADC and DAC to take the same time. This means that the Scarlett provided 4 ms DAC and DAC latencies. Which is a very good value.

Finally, by looking at the table in this post, we can see that 13 ms is just below the threshold at which latency starts to be audible as a delay for guitar players. So, the Scarlett was able to give a good latency performance, ensuring a stable JACK setup for which delays were inaudible. Other than comparing well with published experimental results, I can confirm I never heard delays when using the Scarlett, although playing on tight grooves felt weird sometimes.

Then the Interface Died

Yes, it died the day before Christmas 2017. How?

Well, I connected a couple of condenser mics, pressed the +48V, and it was gone just as the first one I had. I did not see this problem being reported a whole lot, so maybe I was really unlucky, but I would consider strange that 2 random devices would die in the same exact way. Probably there is something wrong in how the +48V power supply was designed or with how the PCB was manufactured.

Since the interface was not under warranty anymore, I decided to open it up to see whether I could spot something obvious. I couldn’t. but I found this:

WhatsApp Image 2018-01-28 at 19.09.00

I am not sure what part is represented in the figure, as I couldn’t quite locate the data sheet. Nevertheless, It has few pins shorted by a blob of solder (see the red squares). Also, many capacitors and inductors were bent. Although this did not seem to alter functionality, it made me think that Focusrite PCB manufacturing quality was probably not that superior to that of cheaper products back in the day. Perhaps, that’s why my 2 units committed suicide by frying themselves with +48V…

Linux Compatibility

Nothing to say about it a part that it was great. Just plug and play. Awesome!

Final Verdict

The Scarlett was overall a very good interface, with very flat frequency response and low latency. Not properly rugged, but not fragile either. It has been a great companion, and I even used it for my master dissertation. Linux compatibility was top notch.

However, the fact that two interfaces died in the same way, the soldering errors on the PCB and the low quality of the connectors made me believe that, at least for the series from which my interface is from, Focusrite did not offer higher quality with respect cheaper interfaces. For this reason, I decided to go for a Behringer UMC202HD as a replacement instead of a new gen. 2i4 (or 2i2).

I will let you know what I think about the Behringer too, after I get to use it for a while.


3 thoughts on “Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 (Old Gen.) on Linux: a Honest Review

  1. Hi Stefano,

    thanks for your report on the Focusrite. I have the 2nd gen 6i6 which works fine, but I have to admit that I don’t plug in my Røde NT-1A mic that often, mostly use it for bass playing/recording right now.

    I wanted to ask your first opinions on the Behringer tho. My brother has his birthday soon, and while he couldn’t afford it I’m actually thinking about giving him such a cheaper device as a present – if it plays well with Linux (he’s on Debian like me right now, and he would probably also configure the KXStudio repos, which is what I did to have the latest Ardour and such).

    So if that’s a good interface which can be recommended, please let me know (and if not, then please let us know as well). Rally looking forward to reading your experiences with it.

    Thanks, and
    kind regards,


    1. Hi wjlonien,

      I am not sure when I will publish a review for the UMC202HD, so here my first impressions.

      Linux compatibility: plug and play, just like the Scarlett. All sample rates work, also 192 kHz.

      Stability: Good. I can use even the highest sample rate with acceptable latency when using Guitarix with the realtime kernel. No need to though, 48 kHz is a good setup. I have the impression it might be even more stable of the Scarlett, but it is hard to tell as I cannot compare them. Not sure even if that is possible.

      Frequency response: I did a very quick measurement, perhaps I will do better later, but it seemed dead flat. Not surprising: since the late 90s every pice of electronic can get super flat for cheap.

      Distortion: I think it might be higher with respect the Scarlett. What I mean is that to show up harmonics I need to drive the input stages with a quieter signal, but I am not sure since I cannot compare with the Scarlett as that is broken for good.

      Background noise: I think this device is more susceptible to background noise with respect the Scarlett. Again, hard to be sure not being able to compare. I could get levels set up to really minimize the problem though, and I can get very clear records. Just need to fiddle with levels a bit more.

      Construction quality: feels far more solid than my Scarlett. Pots and switches are pretty sturdy, and I think the connectors are higher quality. It might feel like this only because it is new though.

      Overall, I think it is good quality for the money. In terms of audio quality, I think it is OK.

      However, I recently found that Focusrite seems to have, at least on paper, some amount of commitment to produce ethical products (see link below). This for me, just by itself, is a good reason to pay more. I couldn’t find anything similar for Behringer (or any other manufacturers). This is one good reason why in the future I might get with some Focusrite products again, even if I was not entirely satisfied with the Scarlett.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thanks for your quick reply and report. Looks like I should just order that Behringer and see if my brother likes it. He’s a bass player as well, so that will be interesting.
        Again, thanks,
        and cheers,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s